Interesting to note that the enzyme plant was given a $28 million dollar tax credit with stimulus funds to build a plant that they perhaps(?) would have built anyway—“within a day’s drive of 60 percent of all ethanol production in the United States.”— according to their own press release. Not sure how to read that. Do you have any insight? Thanks.
My only insight is that I would not turn down a $28 million offer if somebody gave it to me for the asking, would you? I have to wonder how much of this stimulus money went to corporations abroad, such as this one.
LOL! No. If I was the CEO of the company I would love it. My dismay is that this credit qualifies as “stimulus”. Sort of like taking Viagara when you dont really need it and the taxpayer is paying for it. Politicians can pass anything off as action and we are none the wiser…
After listening to ethanol lobbyists and enthusiasts beg the public to embrace the use of E85, beg the government to provide the needed infrastructure of tanks and pumps at gas stations, beg the automotive industry to produce the engines for it, and beg for its use in government owned vehicles, now all of a sudden the ASTM International (formerly American Society for Testing and Materials) has decided that E51 should become the minimum ethanol volume for E85
Haha, yeah, ‘no one could have seen that coming’, that happens when the technical data is ignored so politics can proceed unimpeded.
I wonder what the percentage of flex-fuel vehicles are in the market, presently, or likely to enter in the, say, next five years ?
I’d estimate that the biggest consumer use of vehicles is also mandated — the government vehicles which are mandated to use the E85 product (see my last news thread under USPS postal vehicles, the article by John Kemp). Most hopes for increasing ethanol use currently lie in E15 now that the EPA has given them the green light they needed. As I know from watching what hinders the developing nations in agricultural trade — infrastructure — if ethanol lobbyists can get the government to pay for needed infrastructure in selling ethanol, then mandate its use, and as usual the apathetic uninformed public doesn’t care or isn’t paying attention, then that is most of what they need to sell the product even if it isn’t economically viable and it unsustainably mines the topsoil.
Did you catch Rapier’s piece on Novazymes ? Why Might Novazymes Oppose My Biofuel Incentive Proposal?
As you note, there are some major hurdles to overcome.
Thanks for the link.
Interesting to note that the enzyme plant was given a $28 million dollar tax credit with stimulus funds to build a plant that they perhaps(?) would have built anyway—“within a day’s drive of 60 percent of all ethanol production in the United States.”— according to their own press release. Not sure how to read that. Do you have any insight? Thanks.
My only insight is that I would not turn down a $28 million offer if somebody gave it to me for the asking, would you? I have to wonder how much of this stimulus money went to corporations abroad, such as this one.
LOL! No. If I was the CEO of the company I would love it. My dismay is that this credit qualifies as “stimulus”. Sort of like taking Viagara when you dont really need it and the taxpayer is paying for it. Politicians can pass anything off as action and we are none the wiser…
Haha, yeah, ‘no one could have seen that coming’, that happens when the technical data is ignored so politics can proceed unimpeded.
I wonder what the percentage of flex-fuel vehicles are in the market, presently, or likely to enter in the, say, next five years ?
I’d estimate that the biggest consumer use of vehicles is also mandated — the government vehicles which are mandated to use the E85 product (see my last news thread under USPS postal vehicles, the article by John Kemp). Most hopes for increasing ethanol use currently lie in E15 now that the EPA has given them the green light they needed. As I know from watching what hinders the developing nations in agricultural trade — infrastructure — if ethanol lobbyists can get the government to pay for needed infrastructure in selling ethanol, then mandate its use, and as usual the apathetic uninformed public doesn’t care or isn’t paying attention, then that is most of what they need to sell the product even if it isn’t economically viable and it unsustainably mines the topsoil.